Search for: All records

The effect of DNA methylation on the regulation of gene expression has been extensively discussed in the literature. However, the potential association between DNA methylation and alternative splicing is not understood well. In this study, we integrated multiple omics data types from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and systematically examined the relationship between DNA methylation and alternative splicing. Using the methylation data and exon expression data, we identified many CpG sites significantly associated with exon expression in various types of cancers. We further observed that the direction and strength of significant CpG-exon correlation tended to be consistent across different cancer contexts, indicating that some CpG-exon correlation patterns reflect fundamental biological mechanisms that transcend tissue- and cancer- types. We also discovered that CpG sites correlated with exon expressions were more likely to be associated with patient survival outcomes compared to CpG sites that did not correlate with exon expressions. Furthermore, we found that CpG sites were more strongly correlated with exon expression than expression of isoforms harboring the corresponding exons. This observation suggests that a major effect of CpG methylation on alternative splicing may be related to the inclusion or exclusion of exons, which subsequently impacts the relative usage of various isoforms. Overall, our study revealed correlation patterns between DNA methylation and alternative splicing, which provides new insights into the role of methylation in the transcriptional process.

 

Abstract Biomarkers predictive of drug-specific outcomes are important tools for personalized medicine. In this study, we present an integrative analysis to identify miRNAs that are predictive of drug-specific survival outcome in cancer. Using the clinical data from TCGA, we defined subsets of cancer patients who suffered from the same cancer and received the same drug treatment, which we call cancer-drug groups. We then used the miRNA expression data in TCGA to evaluate each miRNA’s ability to predict the survival outcome of patients in each cancer-drug group. As a result, the identified miRNAs are predictive of survival outcomes in a cancer-specific and drug-specific manner. Notably, most of the drug-specific miRNA survival markers and their target genes showed consistency in terms of correlations in their expression and their correlations with survival. Some of the identified miRNAs were supported by published literature in contexts of various cancers. We explored several additional breast cancer datasets that provided miRNA expression and survival data, and showed that our drug-specific miRNA survival markers for breast cancer were able to effectively stratify the prognosis of patients in those additional datasets. Together, this analysis revealed drug-specific miRNA markers for cancer survival, which can be promising tools toward personalized medicine. 

Background: Though the development of targeted cancer drugs continues to accelerate, doctors still lack reliable methods for predicting patient response to standard-of-care therapies for most cancers. DNA methylation has been implicated in tumor drug response and is a promising source of predictive biomarkers of drug efficacy, yet the relationship between drug efficacy and DNA methylation remains largely unexplored. Method: In this analysis, we performed log-rank survival analyses on patients grouped by cancer and drug exposure to find CpG sites where binary methylation status is associated with differential survival in patients treated with a specific drug but not in patients with the same cancer who were not exposed to that drug. We also clustered these drug-specific CpG sites based on co-methylation among patients to identify broader methylation patterns that may be related to drug efficacy, which we investigated for transcription factor binding site enrichment using gene set enrichment analysis. Results: We identified CpG sites that were drug-specific predictors of survival in 38 cancer-drug patient groups across 15 cancers and 20 drugs. These included 11 CpG sites with similar drug-specific survival effects in multiple cancers. We also identified 76 clusters of CpG sites with stronger associations with patient drug response, many of which contained CpG sites in gene promoters containing transcription factor binding sites. Conclusion: These findings are promising biomarkers of drug response for a variety of drugs and contribute to our understanding of drug-methylation interactions in cancer. Investigation and validation of these results could lead to the development of targeted co-therapies aimed at manipulating methylation in order to improve efficacy of commonly used therapies and could improve patient survival and quality of life by furthering the effort toward drug response prediction. 

Novel discoveries of biomarkers predictive of drug-specific responses not only play a pivotal role in revealing the drug mechanisms in cancers, but are also critical to personalized medicine. In this study, we identified drug-specific biomarkers by integrating protein expression data, drug treatment data and survival outcome of 7076 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We first defined cancer-drug groups, where each cancer-drug group contains patients with the same cancer and treated with the same drug. For each protein, we stratified the patients in each cancer-drug group by high or low expression of the protein, and applied log-rank test to examine whether the stratified patients show significant survival difference. We examined 336 proteins in 98 cancer-drug groups and identified 65 protein-cancer-drug combinations involving 55 unique proteins, where the protein expression levels are predictive of drug-specific survival outcomes. Some of the identified proteins were supported by published literature. Using the gene expression data from TCGA, we found the mRNA expression of ∼11% of the drug-specific proteins also showed significant correlation with drug-specific survival, and most of these drug-specific proteins and their corresponding genes are strongly correlated.